You know who wouldn't have done us all this way? Tom. Tom from MySpace wanted to be friends with everyone. Zuck disdained from extending membership outside of specific schools initially and then for years kept it only for universities. I'll never understand why Facebook won when their (stolen) concept wasn't better or easier to use or more accessible.
You know who wouldn't have done us all this way? Tom. Tom from MySpace wanted to be friends with everyone. Zuck disdained from extending membership outside of specific schools initially and then for years kept it only for universities. I'll never understand why Facebook won when their (stolen) concept wasn't better or easier to use or more accessible.
I place much importance on inception stories; the 'why' behind an inception. And Facebook has the ugliest inception story ever for a big company; these guys wanted to rate hot chicks because they lacked the social skills to connect in person. This energy has spread throughout the world now. The purpose behind the site was to literally perve on girls, and the 'loser' behind this has now been crowned king.
Yes, and not just perv on "girls" - by which we mean WOMEN - but to perv on the ones who attended Harvard. Dude felt pissy about the very existence of "successful" (however superficially) women. So he snagged the headshots of an Ivy League group and reduced them to their looks by rating them with his loser incel buddies. As if attractivenes isn't subjective and as if anyone gaf what some creeps think. Lol.
Zuckerberg works for the deep state. He appears to secretly be of the Rockefeller house. Men like him love being submissive to their masters. They love to steal and take credit and stomp out the competition by any means necessary. His fame and position are totally manufactured.
It's no matter; we will render them all irrelevant. Say bye-bye, deep state.
True, I don't even think initially any of the actual innovators behind social media thought they were building something to get rich from. Livejournal and friendster developers should be wealthy if that were the case.
People like you are just trolls who have nothing better to do than annoy people. Why don't you admit it? Incidentally, I don't do business with trolls, especially the ones who have nothing of substance to add. Bye bye.
You know who wouldn't have done us all this way? Tom. Tom from MySpace wanted to be friends with everyone. Zuck disdained from extending membership outside of specific schools initially and then for years kept it only for universities. I'll never understand why Facebook won when their (stolen) concept wasn't better or easier to use or more accessible.
I place much importance on inception stories; the 'why' behind an inception. And Facebook has the ugliest inception story ever for a big company; these guys wanted to rate hot chicks because they lacked the social skills to connect in person. This energy has spread throughout the world now. The purpose behind the site was to literally perve on girls, and the 'loser' behind this has now been crowned king.
The lore never reflects the reality. It needs to be repeated, loudly, often. It's essentially built-in to the platform's very stupid name.
Yes, and not just perv on "girls" - by which we mean WOMEN - but to perv on the ones who attended Harvard. Dude felt pissy about the very existence of "successful" (however superficially) women. So he snagged the headshots of an Ivy League group and reduced them to their looks by rating them with his loser incel buddies. As if attractivenes isn't subjective and as if anyone gaf what some creeps think. Lol.
Zuckerberg works for the deep state. He appears to secretly be of the Rockefeller house. Men like him love being submissive to their masters. They love to steal and take credit and stomp out the competition by any means necessary. His fame and position are totally manufactured.
It's no matter; we will render them all irrelevant. Say bye-bye, deep state.
All of your assertions about ZuckerbergтАж Provide proof please.
WhatтАЩs wrong with perving on girls? As long as itтАЩs done politely and with some respectтАж I mean itтАЩs one of my favorite hobbies! ЁЯдУЁЯда
You're also a bootlicker, so of course...
If the world were 50% populated with huge gay dudes, would you feel okay with them perving on you? My point is that you may be on the DL.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_LifeLog
"I'll never understand why Facebook won when their (stolen) concept wasn't better or easier to use or more accessible."
Because equally sociopathic Vulture Capitalists smelled the opportunity and decided to promote them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_LifeLog
True, I don't even think initially any of the actual innovators behind social media thought they were building something to get rich from. Livejournal and friendster developers should be wealthy if that were the case.
People like you are just jealous of Zuckerberg. Why donтАЩt you just admit it? YouтАЩre bitter.
People like you are just trolls who have nothing better to do than annoy people. Why don't you admit it? Incidentally, I don't do business with trolls, especially the ones who have nothing of substance to add. Bye bye.