Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Diana van Eyk's avatar

We can't be fooled, and we need solidarity more than ever.

"Anyone trying to sell us a world where we get safer by attacking, deporting, or going to war with another scapegoated group must be rejected. As capitalism faces a real threat from the left, and from the internal pressure generated from growing inequality it has created, we will see the super-rich go even further right, eager to ally with those who would hurt masses of people if it protects their wealth."

Expand full comment
Bertrand's avatar

First of all, thanks for this clear text on a subject that everyone seems to think as complex.

I wanted to comment in order to share about the situation here in France, where the 'centrist' government espouses libertarian and fascist views, maybe by political calculations as you said, maybe by 'honest' right-wing ideology, and where far-right is legitimated by them and by billionaires-owned journalists.

On the point of adopting far-right views in order to gain elections, I think that it is essentially by honest right-wing ideology or to please billionaires, who own the medias (and so have the power to make the elected president and to destroy an elected one). Because our 'centrist' government never was as 'centrist' as they said prior to elections : they never stopped adopting libertarian bills as well as a far-right agenda. They seem to never have a social point of view, or when it comes to it, they do some temporary social (as we have seen it with the covid crisis), but it is never definitely written in the law. So, if they are unable to be even a little bit socialist but eager to adopt right-wing bills, is not their centrist position just a statement ?

One word on journalism here. In the last 20 to 30 years, we have seen that some billionaires buy all the medias they can and place right-wing if not far-right people in positions of power in these medias. We can see an exemple with Historia, a magazine on history, recently buyed by Bernard Arnault, who placed a far-right 'polemist' as its chief editor. Even the public service of TV and radio is slowly eaten by right-wing people, when left-wing are told to quit.

You could also have spoken about the police and the army, that are more and more infiltrated by fascist, racist and libertarian ideology, thus creating a dangerous counterpower for those who would like to change for good. At some points we have seen here that our interior affairs minister was afraid to do anything against his police. But again, it could have been just a posture, because he has some ties with far-right.

One last important point. Antisemitism here is used to disqualify left-wing people who support Palestinian people and call to end the oppression on them, meanwhile antisemitic far-right is showing its full support to Israel. This support leads to a validation of the far-right, who could walk hand in hand with elected members of the parliament in a march against antisemitism. This situation is creating a paradox where antifascist left is accused of hate speech and antisemitic-racist-hating right is validated as a gardian force of the republic. Us who can see are astounded by the inversion that is made recently. This inversion is meant to make things fuzzy, so we don't know anymore where evil is, where good is : in this foggy atmosphere even the worse can win elections.

Difficult times are coming for sure, but I am still glad some of us can see clear trough the lies !

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts